|
CA v SSHD [2004] INLR 453, CA. Scope of Immigration Appeal Tribunal's jurisdiction on issues of law.
R v SSHD ex p Jeyeanthan [2000] 1 WLR 354, CA. Rules of immigration appeal procedure did not invalidate a defective appeal notice, but required tribunal to consider whether consequences of defect could and should be remedied.
AM ( Cameroon ) [2007] EWCA Civ 131
R(G) v [2005] 2 All er 165
R(M) v IAT [2004] EWCA Civ 1731
E v SSHD [2004] EWCA Civ 49
R v The Secretary of State ex part Sivakumaran 1988 AC 958-
It is on the appellant to show that he is entitled to Asylum
Fear of persecution is to be determined subjectively
Whether such a fear is well-founded must be determined objectively
Perescution was defined as ' serious harasment'
Jonah 1985 Imm AR7-
Meaning of persecution-
Horvath 2001 AC489
applicant for refugee status must show that the persecution which he fears consist of acts of violence or ill-treatment against which the state is unable or unwilling to provide protection.
Kacaj 2002 Imm AR,213
Stander of proof in a human rights appeal
Ullah & Do 2002 EWCA 1856
http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/4174.htm
| 
